Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

© 1996 by Alejandro A. Torassa

atorassa@gmail.com

Argentina

In this work a new dynamics is developed, which is valid for all observers, and which establishes, among other things, the existence of a new universal force of interaction, called kinetic force, which balances the remaining forces acting on a body. In this new dynamics, the motion of a body is not determined by the forces acting on it; instead, the body itself determines its own motion, since as a result of such motion it exerts over all other bodies the kinetic force which is necessary to keep the system of forces acting on each of them always in equilibrium.

It is known that in classical mechanics Newton's dynamics cannot be formulated for all reference frames, since it does not conserve its form when passing from one reference frame to another. For instance, if we admit that Newton's dynamics is valid for a chosen reference frame, then we cannot admit it to be valid for a reference frame which is accelerated relative to the first one, for the description of the behavior of a body from the accelerated reference frame differs from the description given by Newton's dynamics.

Classical mechanics solves this difficulty by separating reference frames into two classes: inertial reference frames, for which Newton's dynamics applies, and non-inertial reference frames, where Newton's dynamics does not apply; but this solution contradicts the principle of general relativity, which states: the laws of physics shall be valid for all reference frames.

However, this work puts forward a different solution to the difficulty from classical mechanics mentioned above, with no need to distinguish among reference frames, and in accordance to the principle of general relativity, starting from Newton's dynamics and the transformations of kinematics and developing a new dynamics which can be formulated for all reference frames, since it conserves its form when passing from one reference frame to another.

The development of the new dynamics will be made in two parts: in the first part, which deals with the classical mechanics of particles, the new dynamics of particles will be developed, starting from Newton's dynamics of particles and the transformations of the kinematics of particles; in the second part, which deals with the classical mechanics of rigid bodies, the new dynamics of rigid bodies will be developed, starting from Newton's dynamics of rigid bodies and the transformations of the kinematics of rigid bodies.

In this work only the first part will be formulated.

**MECHANICS OF PARTICLESKINEMATICS OF PARTICLESDYNAMICS OF PARTICLESCONSERVATION LAWS OF PARTICLESGENERAL OBSERVATIONSBIBLIOGRAPHY**

The classical mechanics of particles considers that the only kind of bodies found in the Universe are particles, and assumes that any reference frame is fixed to a particle. Therefore, in the classical mechanics of particles, it can be assumed that reference frames are not rotating.

If reference frames are not rotating, then each coordinate axis of a reference frame S will remain at a fixed angle to the corresponding coordinate axis of another reference frame S'. Therefore, to simplify calculations it will be assumed that each axis of S is parallel to the corresponding axis of S', as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

If a reference frame S of axes O(X,Y,Z) determines an event by means of three space coordinates X, Y, Z and one time coordinate T, then another reference frame S' of axes O'(X',Y',Z') determines the same event by means of three space coordinates X', Y', Z' and one time coordinate T'.

A change of coordinates X, Y, Z, T from reference frame S to coordinates X', Y', Z', T' from reference frame S' whose origin O' has coordinates Xo', Yo', Zo' measured from S, can be carried out by means of the following equations:

From these equations, the transformation of velocity and acceleration from reference frame S to reference frame S' may be carried out, and expressed in vector form as follows:

where **V**o' and **A**o' are the velocity and acceleration respectively, of reference frame S' relative to S.

Newton's first law: Any particle in a state of rest or of uniform linear motion tends to remain in such a state unless acted upon by an unbalanced external force.

Newton's second law: The sum of all forces acting on a particle A produces an acceleration in the direction of the force, and directly proportional to that force.

where Ma is the inertial mass of particle A.

Newton's third law: If a particle A exerts a force **F** on a particle B, then particle B exerts on particle A a force -**F** of the same magnitude but opposite direction.

The transformation of real forces from one reference frame to another is given by

The transformation of inertial masses from one reference frame to another is given by

Let us consider a Universe composed of three particles A, B, and C which follow Newton's dynamics from reference frame S (inertial frame). Therefore, the behavior of such particles will be given (from S) by the equations

From the equations (1) and by means of the transformations of dynamics and kinematics, it can be shown that the behavior of particles A, B, and C will be determined from a reference frame S' by the equations

where **A**'o is the acceleration of reference frame S relative to S', which is equal and opposite to the acceleration -**A**o' of reference frame S' relative to S.

As the equations (2) are the same as the equations (1) only if the acceleration **A**'o of reference frame S relative to S' is equal to zero, then the behavior of particles A, B, and C cannot be determined from any (accelerated) reference frame by the equations (1).

Now, if the equations (2) are added together, it yields

It follows from Newton's third law that *S* **F**'a + *S* **F**'b + *S* **F**'c = 0, and from (3), **A**'o may be expressed as

As the right-hand side of (4) is the acceleration **A**'cm of the center of mass of the Universe relative to the reference frame S', then

Substituting into the equations (2) yields the following equations:

Therefore, the behavior of particles A, B, and C is now determined from the reference frame S' by the equations (6), which are equivalent to the equations (2).

Now, if the equations (6) are transformed from reference frame S' to S using the transformations of kinematics and dynamics, the resulting equations become

It follows that the behavior of particles A, B, and C will now be determined from reference frame S by the equations (7), which are equivalent to the equations (1) only if the acceleration **A**cm of the center of mass of the Universe relative to the reference frame S equals zero, a fact that may be verified by adding together the equations (1):

Dividing both sides of (8) by Ma + Mb + Mc and using the fact that *S* **F**a + *S* **F**b + *S* **F**c = 0 from Newton's third law, (8) yields

Considering that the equations (7) have the same form as the equations (6), then the behavior of particles A, B, and C will be determined from any reference frame by the equations (7), and will be determined by the equations (1) only if the acceleration of the center of mass of the Universe relative to that reference frame is zero.

Now, the equations (7) can be arranged as follows:

Substituting (9) into (10) and factoring

If the second and third terms of the left-hand sides of each one of the equations (11) is taken as a new force **F**° acting on the corresponding particle, and exerted by the remaining particles, then it can be seen that **F**° conserves its form when passing from one reference frame to another; in addition, if a particle exerts a force **F**° on another particle, the latter exerts on the first particle a force -**F**° of equal magnitude and opposite direction. Therefore, as the second and third terms of the left-hand sides of each one of the equations (11) represent the sum of the new forces *S* **F**° acting on the particles, then

And adding the second term to the first yields

Consequently, it can be established that the behavior of particles A, B, and C will be determined from any reference frame by the equations (13), which may be stated as follows: if the new force is added to the sum of real forces, the resulting force will be zero, yielding a system in equilibrium.

Consequently, it is possible to conceive a new dynamics, which can be formulated for all reference frames. The usual explanation for the motion of particles is that particles undergo a certain motion in response to the external forces acting on them, following Newton's first and second laws. The new dynamics, instead, considers that particles experience a certain motion because in that way they balance the sum of real forces with the new force.

From now on, the new force will be called kinetic force, since it is a force which depends on the motion of particles, and the magnitude M (mass) will be called kinetic mass instead of inertial mass, since in the new dynamics particles do not exhibit the property known as inertia.

First principle: A particle can have any state of motion.

Second principle: The forces acting upon a particle A always remain balanced.

Third principle: If a particle A exerts a force **F** on a particle B, then particle B exerts on particle A a force -**F** of the same magnitude but opposite direction.

The transformation of real forces from one reference frame to another, is given by the following equation:

The kinetic force **FK**ab exerted on a particle A by another particle B, caused by the interaction between particle A and particle B, is given by the following equation:

where Ma is the kinetic mass of particle A, Mb is the kinetic mass of particle B, **A**b is the acceleration of particle B, **A**a is the acceleration of particle A, and MT is the total kinetic mass of the Universe.

The transformation of kinetic masses from one reference frame to another is given by the following equation:

From the previous statements it follows that the sum of kinetic forces *S* **FK**a acting on a particle A is given by

where Ma is the kinetic mass of particle A, **A**cm is the acceleration of the center of kinetic mass of the Universe and **A**a is the acceleration of particle A.

The equation determining the acceleration **A**a of a particle A relative to a reference frame S fixed to a particle S may be calculated as follows: the sum of the kinetic forces *S* **FK**a acting on particle A and the sum of the kinetic forces *S* **FK**s acting on particle S, are given by the following equations:

Combining both equations yields

Since the acceleration **A**s of particle S relative to the reference frame S equals zero always, **A**a may be obtained from the last equation as

Since from the second principle of the new dynamics the sum of the kinetic forces (*S* **FK**) acting on a particle equals the opposite of the sum of the non-kinetic forces (-*S* **FN**) acting on the particle, we have

Therefore, the acceleration **A**a of a particle A relative to a reference frame S fixed to a particle S will be determined by the last equation, where *S* **FN**a is the sum of the non-kinetic forces acting on particle A, Ma is the mass of particle A (from now on, kinetic mass will be referred to as mass), *S* **FN**s is the sum of the non-kinetic forces acting on particle S, and Ms is the mass of particle S.

A reference frame S fixed to a particle S is said to be in the galilean circumstance if the sum of the non-kinetic forces acting on particle S equals zero.

If reference frame S is in the galilean circumstance, then, by the second principle of the new dynamics it can be shown that the sum of the kinetic forces *S* **FK**s acting on particle S equals zero, that is

And, as the acceleration **A**s of particle S relative to the reference frame S equals zero always, then

That is, the acceleration of the center of mass of the Universe relative to a reference frame in the galilean circumstance is zero.

A system of particles is said to be isolated if the sum of the non-kinetic external forces acting on the system equals zero.

Therefore, if a system of particles is isolated, by the second principle of the new dynamics, the sum of the internal non-kinetic forces *S* **FN**i and the internal and external kinetic forces *S* **FK** equals zero:

Substituting *S* **FK** from expression (14) applied to a system of N particles, and taking into account that *S* **FN**i = 0 from the third principle of the new dynamics, it follows that

from which **A**cm can be expressed as

And as the right-hand side is the acceleration **A**cms of the isolated system, then

Therefore, the acceleration of the center of mass of an isolated system equals the acceleration of the center of mass of the Universe.

On one hand, the acceleration of the center of mass of an isolated system equals the acceleration of the center of mass of the Universe and, on the other hand, the acceleration of the center of mass of the Universe relative to a reference frame in the galilean circumstance equals zero.

Therefore, the acceleration of the center of mass of an isolated system relative to a reference frame in the galilean circumstance equals zero; that is

Multiplying both sides of this equation by Ma + Mb + ... + Mn and integrating with respect to time yields

As the left-hand side is the total linear momentum **P** of the isolated system, then

Therefore, for a reference frame in the galilean circumstance the total linear momentum of an isolated system is conserved.

The total work W done by the forces acting on a particle is given by

Grouping yields

As **F**a + **F**b + ... + **F**n = 0 by the second principle of the new dynamics, it follows that

That is, the total work done by the forces acting on a particle equals zero.

But the total work W done by the interacting kinetic forces **FK**a and **FK**b acting on particles A and B respectively, is given by

or else

resulting in

If we call the energy of the kinetic force live energy, then the expression between brackets represents the live energy ELab of the system particle A - particle B; therefore

It follows that the total work done by the interacting kinetic forces acting on a particle A and a particle B is equal and opposite in sign to the live energy difference of the system particle A - particle B; with the live energy of the system given by

where Ma is the mass of particle A, Mb is the mass of particle B, **V**a is the velocity of particle A, **V**b is the velocity of particle B, and MT is the total mass of the Universe.

The total work W done by the kinetic forces acting on an isolated system is

that is

Substituting **A**cm in the last equation by the acceleration **A**cms of the center of mass of the isolated system, since **A**cms is equal to **A**cm, yields

The expression between brackets represents the total live energy EL of the isolated system, then

Therefore, the total work done by the kinetic forces acting on an isolated system equals minus the total live energy difference of the isolated system, where the total live energy EL of an isolated system is given by

where EK is the total kinetic energy of the isolated system, **P** is the total linear momentum of the isolated system, and MS is the total mass of the isolated system.

The total work done by the forces acting on a particle equals zero; therefore, the total work W done by the forces acting on an isolated system equals zero.

If the total work W is divided into two parts: the total work Wfn done by the non-kinetic forces and the total work Wfk done by the kinetic forces, then

As Wfk equals minus the total live energy difference of the isolated system, then

If the non-kinetic forces acting on the isolated system do not perform work, it follows that

that is

or else

Therefore, if the non-kinetic forces acting on an isolated system do not perform work, the total live energy of the isolated system is conserved.

On the other hand, if the total live energy of an isolated system is conserved, then from a reference frame in the galilean circumstance the total kinetic energy of the isolated system is conserved too, since for such system the total linear momentum remains constant.

It is currently known that in order to describe the behavior (motion) of a body from a non-inertial reference frame in classical mechanics, it is necessary to introduce apparent forces called fictitious forces (also called pseudo-forces, inertial forces or non-inertial forces). Unlike real forces, fictitious forces are not caused by the interaction between bodies, that is, if there is a fictitious force **F** acting on a body A, then a fictitious force -**F** of the same magnitude but opposite direction acting on another body B cannot be found; that is, fictitious forces do not obey Newton's third law.

On the other hand, in the theory of general relativity, based on the principle of equivalence, it is established that fictitious forces are caused, in a generalized sense, by a gravitational field which all non-inertial reference frames experience, that is, in the theory of general relativity fictitious forces are equivalent to gravitational forces.

But, why are fictitious forces not caused by the interaction between bodies, just as real forces are? Why do not fictitious forces conserve their value when passing from one non-inertial reference frame to another inertial reference frame, just as real forces do? If fictitious forces are equivalent to gravitational forces, then why are fictitious forces not caused by the interaction between bodies and do not conserve their value when passing from one non-inertial reference frame to another inertial reference frame, just as gravitational forces are caused and conserve their value?

It can be stated that neither classical mechanics nor the theory of general relativity give satisfactory answers to the above mentioned questions and that, therefore, it should be accepted that apparently experience shows that to describe the behavior (motion) of a body from a non-inertial reference frame it is necessary to introduce fictitious forces that do not behave in the same way that real forces do.

However, this work does give satisfactory answers to the above mentioned questions, since it is deduced from it that, in fact, experience does not show that fictitious forces that do not behave as real forces exist, but experience does show that there exists a new real force which is still ignored and that the so called fictitious forces are in fact mathematical expressions that partially represent this new real force.

In this work the new real force, called kinetic force, behaves like the other real forces, that is, it is a force caused by the interaction between bodies and conserves its value when passing from one reference frame to another. But, on the other hand, it is established in this work that the goal of the kinetic force is to balance the remaining real forces acting on a body, that is, the kinetic force is the real force that makes the sum of all the real forces acting on a body be always equal to zero.

Now, how is it possible then to change the natural state of motion of a body, if according to Newton's first and second laws, based on the principle of inertia, it is established that the natural state of motion of a body will only change when there is an unbalanced external force acting on it?

In contradiction with the principle of inertia, it is established in this work that in the absence of external forces the natural state of motion of a body is not only the state of rest or of uniform linear motion, but that the natural state of motion of a body in the absence of external forces is any possible state of motion; that is, any possible state of motion is a natural state of motion. However, the previous statement does not mean that there is no relation between the motion of bodies and the forces acting on them, since such a relation exists and is mathematically expressed in the new dynamics developed in this work.

In the new dynamics the motion is the mechanism that bodies have, which makes it possible for the kinetic force to balance the remaining forces acting on a body, since as a result of its motion a body exerts over all other bodies the kinetic force which is necessary to keep the system of forces acting on each of them always in equilibrium.

On the other hand, in this work it is not necessary to separate reference frames into two classes: inertial reference frames and non-inertial reference frames, since through the new dynamics the behavior (motion) of a body can be described exactly in the same way from any reference frame. That is, the new dynamics is in accord with the principle of general relativity, which states: the laws of physics shall be valid for all reference frames.

As a final conclusion it can be said that physics has two possible options: to develop classical mechanics based on the principle of inertia, as a first option, or to develop classical mechanics not based on the principle of inertia, as a second option.

However, this work, at least in the classical mechanics of particles, demonstrates, on one hand, that the second option is in accord with what experience shows and, on the other hand, that from a theoretical point of view the second option is widely superior to the first one.

**A. Einstein**, Relativity: The Special and General Theory.

**E. Mach**, The Science of Mechanics.

**R. Resnick and D. Halliday**, Physics.

**J. Kane and M. Sternheim**, Physics.

**H. Goldstein**, Classical Mechanics.

**L. Landau and E. Lifshitz**, Mechanics.

**All Papers**

paper1.pdf On Classical Mechanics

paper2.pdf On the Classical Mechanics of Particles II

paper3.pdf On the Classical Mechanics of Particles III

paper4.pdf A New Approach to Classical Mechanics

paper5.pdf A New Formulation of Classical Mechanics

paper6.pdf On Reference Frames

paper7.pdf A New Equation of Motion for a Particle in Classical Mechanics

paper8.pdf On New Laws of Motion for a Particle in Classical Mechanics

paper9.pdf Classical Mechanics (Basic Papers: A brief review)

paper10.pdf Classical Mechanics (Diagram)

paper11.pdf Central Reference Frame

paper12.pdf Principle of Relativity

paper13.pdf Classical Mechanics: Particles and Biparticles

paper14.pdf Classical Mechanics (Principle of Energy)

paper15.pdf Is the principle of least action a tautology ?

paper16.pdf Is the principle of energy a tautology ?

paper17.pdf Moment of Inertia

paper18.pdf Classical Mechanics (General Definitions)

paper19.pdf Classical Dynamics of Particles

paper20.pdf Classical Dynamics of Biparticles

paper21.pdf Universal Reference Frame

paper22.pdf General Equation of Motion

paper23.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics

paper24.pdf Principle of Relativity

paper25.pdf Principle of Conservation

paper26.pdf Angular Magnitudes

paper27.pdf Angular Kinetic Energy

paper28.pdf Angular Potential Energy

paper29.pdf Angular Mechanical Energy

paper30.pdf Principle of Least Angular Action

paper31.pdf Linear Magnitudes

paper32.pdf A Scalar Equation of Motion

paper33.pdf A Linear Equation of Motion

paper34.pdf A Group of Invariant Equations

paper35.pdf A Definition of Work

paper36.pdf Universal Classical Mechanics

paper37.pdf Angular Classical Mechanics

paper38.pdf Linear Classical Mechanics

paper39.pdf General Classical Mechanics

paper40.pdf A New Principle of Least Action

paper41.pdf A New Principle of Conservation of Energy

paper42.pdf A New System of Equations in Classical Mechanics

paper43.pdf A Principle of Conservation of Relational Energy

paper44.pdf The Principle of Conservation of Energy

paper45.pdf A Reformulation of Classical Mechanics

paper46.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics II

paper47.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics III

paper48.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics IV

**Relevant Papers**

paper1.pdf On Classical Mechanics

paper13.pdf Classical Mechanics: Particles and Biparticles

paper18.pdf Classical Mechanics (General Definitions)

paper22.pdf General Equation of Motion

paper23.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics

paper24.pdf Principle of Relativity

paper34.pdf A Group of Invariant Equations

paper41.pdf A New Principle of Conservation of Energy

paper45.pdf A Reformulation of Classical Mechanics

**Extra Papers**

paper46.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics II

paper47.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics III

paper48.pdf Alternative Classical Mechanics IV

**Antonio A. Blatter**